The latest submission on SHP’s planning application is from the Kent Wildlife Trust who say – “Kent Wildlife Trust would like to submit a ‘holding objection’ to the proposed development, subject to [the above] information being provided in advance of determination.”
They are particularly keen on protecting the brown hare who has a “high” priority status Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act (2006).
Here is the letter in full
TH/16/0550 redevelopment of site at Manston Airport, Manston Road, Manston, Ramsgate
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the hybrid application for redevelopment of Manston Airport.
As this is such a significant development, Kent Wildlife Trust would expect it to demonstrate good quality enhancement for biodiversity, in accordance with paragraph 118 of the NPPF. Although this site is just outside any Biodiversity Opportunity Area (BOA), we would like to see consideration being given to its position on the chalk plateau and a locally-appropriate species planting list.
Particular focus on well-designed and functional green infrastructure is important on a site of such a large scale, to bring biodiversity and species movement through into the site and to allow it to connect well with its surroundings. The scheme layout should reflect surrounding natural features. At the moment, the outline for residential development indicated does not appear to make the most of this opportunity and we would like to see more substantial broad connecting vegetated greenways across the residential section of the site both from the wood the edge park and also from the managed open space, “Spitfire Park” to the north.
Species and Habitats
Kent Wildlife Trust cannot accept the conclusion draw that there will be negligible impact on brown hare1. We would like further clarification on how this conclusion was drawn and further detailed proposals to mitigate for this species (3.7.10 Executive summary).
We note the comments from KCC’s ecological service (23/06/16) regarding outstanding species surveys. We would most certainly support the recommendation that Thanet District Council does not determine an application, even at outline stage, without the required survey information being available. This should not be conditioned and the results of these surveys should be used to inform outline design and mitigation2.
It is crucial that Thanet District Council satisfies itself that this significant development, comprising a high number of residential dwellings, does not have a negative impact upon nearby internationally protected sites of Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and SAC. Financial contribution needs to be made to the infrastructure for reducing the impacts from increased visitors. This contribution should be incorporated into the current policy (SAMMs) and take the same approach. In addition to a financial contribution, provision needs to be made for alternative, accessible greenspace (SANGs). We would recommend that any SANGs planned as part of this development should be completed and available for residents in advance of occupation of dwellings.
Kent Wildlife Trust would like to submit a holding objection to the proposed development, subject to the above information being provided in advance of determination.
Planning and Policy Officer
1 Brown Hare are section 41 species of “high” priority status Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act (2006)
2 Government Circular 06/2005